Targeting target shareholders∗
نویسندگان
چکیده
We integrate heterogeneity and uncertainty in investor valuations into a model of takeovers. Investors have dispersed valuations, holding shares in firms they value more highly, and a successful offer must win approval from the median target shareholder. We derive the consequences for an acquiring firm’s takeover offer—its size and cash/equity structure—and implications for takeover premia and firm returns. Cash offers are best for the acquirer when the acquirer’s own valuation is high relative to target shareholders. Equity offers are best given the reverse. The acquirer’s share price always rises following cash acquisitions, but can fall following equity offers. The combined target-acquirer return is always higher after cash acquisitions than equity acquisitions (which can be negative). We characterize how synergies and uncertainty about target shareholder valuations affect the optimal offer and probability a takeover succeeds. ∗We thank Jie Gan and seminar participants at Arizona State University, Central University of Finance and Economics, and Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business for helpful comments. Address for correspondence: Dan Bernhardt (corresponding author), University of Illinois, Champaign IL 61801 [email protected], tel: 217-244-5708, fax: 217-244-6678; Tingjun Liu, Cheung Kong Graduate School of Business, [email protected]; Robert Marquez, University of California at Davis, [email protected]. Targeting target shareholders
منابع مشابه
Synergy Motivation and Target Ownership Structure: Effects on Takeover Performance
In this research, we find statistically significant positive abnormal returns around takeover announcements for combined firms. The cumulative average abnormal returns for combined firms are 4.62% over the event-window [-20, +20], which suggests that takeovers create shareholder wealth (synergy motive). In addition, we examine the impact of ownership structure in target firms on the abnormal re...
متن کاملWho’s Cheating Whom in Mergers and Acquisitions?
Most mergers and acquisitions involve at least four parties with competing interests — acquiring firm shareholders, acquiring firm management, target firm shareholders, and target firm management. We consider the choice between hostile and friendly takeovers in this context and offer an explanation for the prevalence of friendly mergers between large acquirers and small targets. Negotiated merg...
متن کاملAdvising Shareholders In Takeovers
This paper studies the advisory role of a target company board in takeovers. I show that coordination failures among target shareholders, such as free-riding, limit the boards ability to properly advise shareholders whether accepting a takeover o¤er is in their best interest based on its information. Even if there are no agency problems and the boards objective is to maximize shareholdersval...
متن کاملCapital Gains Taxation and the Cost of Capital: Evidence from Unanticipated Cross-Border Transfers of Tax Bases
In a cross-border takeover, the tax base associated with future capital gains is transferred from target shareholders to acquirer shareholders. Cross-country differences in capital gains tax rates enable us to estimate the discount in the takeover price on account of future capital gains. The estimation suggests that a one percentage point increase in the capital gains tax rate reduces the valu...
متن کاملMergers and Acquisitions: Strategic and Informational Issues
A merger is a transaction that combines two firms, leaving one surviving entity. An acquisition is the purchase of one firm by another individual or firm. Both transactions fall under the more general heading of takeovers. Takeovers can play a constructive economic role, for example by removing inefficient management or by achieving economies of scale and complementarity. On the other hand, the...
متن کامل